Application Name

Beginning Price

Designed for…





…people searching for long term relationships and marriage

Good-for LTR, trustworthy pages, distinctive matching program

Expensive, not quite as accommodating to casual daters



…all-round dating, informal and severe

Caters generally, cheaper, huge individual base

Numerous inactive users



…all-round internet dating, leaning towards hook-ups and relaxed

Swiping system makes fast matches, locates people in your own instant region

Not as favorable to LTR or severe contacts

Professional Singles


…white-collar pros

Beneficial to internet dating and networking, fulfill folks on the same socio-economic level to you

High-priced for a distinct segment, a lot more minimal pool of customers



…women who would like more control regarding online dating share; males that like powerful females

Female-friendly features including some sort of “veto” energy for women customers

Costly, nevertheless a rising user base (however bad)



LGBT – mainly guys looking for guys

Very reasonable, big user base

Powerful give attention to hook-up tradition, less numerous trying to find LTR

The Woman


LGBT – mostly women searching for women

Strong features, decent individual base, user friendly

Restricted swiping on no-cost reports; no handbook search function